Russia Condemns US Strike on Venezuela as Global Tensions Escalate
Russia has sharply condemned a reported United States military strike on Venezuela, warning that such actions risk further destabilising an already fragile international order and could trigger wider global consequences.
In an official statement, the Russian Foreign Ministry described the US action as an “act of armed aggression”, arguing that it violates international law and undermines the sovereignty of an independent nation. Moscow accused Washington of continuing a pattern of unilateral military behaviour that disregards diplomatic solutions and international institutions.
Venezuela, already facing years of economic hardship, political pressure, and sanctions, has long been a focal point of geopolitical rivalry between major global powers. The latest developments signal a dangerous escalation, particularly as global tensions remain high across multiple regions.
Russian officials stressed that the use of military force without broad international consensus only deepens global divisions. They warned that continued interventionist policies could lead to unintended consequences, not only for Latin America but for global security as a whole.
The government of Venezuela, led by Nicolás Maduro, has consistently rejected US involvement in its internal affairs, framing such actions as attempts to impose external control over the country’s political future and natural resources. Venezuela maintains strong diplomatic and strategic ties with Russia, which has repeatedly voiced support for Caracas on the international stage.
For its part, the United States has defended its stance on Venezuela by citing concerns over democracy, human rights, and regional stability. However, critics argue that military actions and sanctions have worsened humanitarian conditions rather than improved them.
Analysts warn that confrontations involving global powers in regions outside traditional conflict zones highlight a shifting world order, where influence is increasingly contested and diplomacy is often sidelined in favour of force.
As reactions continue to unfold, calls are growing for restraint and renewed dialogue. Many observers believe that only sustained diplomatic engagement — rather than military escalation — can prevent further deterioration of international relations and protect civilian populations from the fallout of great-power rivalry.
The United States has publicly defended its recent military action involving Venezuela during a press conference in Washington, as Russia continues to condemn the move as a serious violation of international law and a threat to global stability.
Speaking to journalists, US officials stated that the action was “necessary and proportionate”, citing concerns related to regional security, governance, and what they described as ongoing threats to stability in the Western Hemisphere. The administration maintained that its approach remains aligned with international norms and insisted that diplomatic options had been exhausted prior to the decision.
However, Russia swiftly rejected the US justification. In a renewed response, Moscow accused Washington of using security narratives to legitimise unilateral force. Russian officials warned that normalising such actions weakens the foundations of international law and increases the risk of confrontation between major powers.
The situation has further intensified tensions surrounding Venezuela, which has for years been under economic sanctions and political pressure. The Venezuelan government argues that external interference has deepened its crisis rather than resolved it.
President Nicolás Maduro has condemned the US position, accusing Washington of attempting to dictate Venezuela’s political future while ignoring the humanitarian impact of sanctions and military pressure. Caracas insists that any internal challenges must be addressed by Venezuelans themselves, without foreign intervention.
Russia reiterated its support for Venezuela’s sovereignty, warning that Latin America must not become another theatre for geopolitical confrontation. Officials in Moscow stressed that dialogue, not force, remains the only sustainable path toward stability.
At the press conference, the United States also dismissed Russia’s criticism, arguing that Moscow has no standing to lecture on international conduct. This exchange underscores the growing strain between global powers as disputes increasingly play out through competing narratives rather than cooperative diplomacy.
Observers note that for many countries across Africa, Latin America, and the wider Global South, the episode reflects long-standing concerns about selective enforcement of international law and unequal power dynamics in global affairs.
As rhetoric hardens on all sides, international analysts warn that continued escalation — both militarily and diplomatically — risks further destabilising global relations at a time when cooperation is urgently needed to address shared challenges.
BRUNDAI cue